Nathan your on the right track; the question about institution is concerned wether your mag. is mainstream or alternative (Bauer - Q; IPC - NME OR an indi publisher).
The pictures don't look professional - not photoshoped and are stretched. Looks a bit tacky - fuzzy pictures, colour scheme. Good written content. Doesn't look loke a mainstream magazine. Over priced!
Lots of red (bright colour) used. Introducing what's happeninmg in the magazine, one main picture. I like the way the have a column each to say there feelings in the double page spread lots of information.
nathan good use of space very readable.
ReplyDeleteVery well laid out and a good use of colour and fonts
ReplyDeleteNathan your on the right track; the question about institution is concerned wether your mag. is mainstream or alternative (Bauer - Q; IPC - NME OR an indi publisher).
ReplyDeleteReally like the colours used photos are quit funny and using a picture of editor is a really good idea.
ReplyDeleteThe pictures don't look professional - not photoshoped and are stretched. Looks a bit tacky - fuzzy pictures, colour scheme. Good written content. Doesn't look loke a mainstream magazine. Over priced!
ReplyDeleteGood sized image. Contents preview - good touch. Not much writing
ReplyDeleteLots of red (bright colour) used. Introducing what's happeninmg in the magazine, one main picture. I like the way the have a column each to say there feelings in the double page spread lots of information.
ReplyDelete